The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG]
,
Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.]
,
GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.
The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano]
,
Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano
This chapter examines the hypothesis that sustainable forest management (as represented by currently good quality forest) is correlated with acknowledgement of the rights of concerned stakeholders to manage the forest. It used a pebble sorting method, designed to assess the allocation of rights t...
Tchingkawa B.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Porro, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
[Rights to manage the forest cooperatively and equitably in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts]
,
Rights to manage the forest cooperatively and equitably in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Panduan penilaian dasar kesejahteraan manusia]
,
Panduan penilaian dasar kesejahteraan manusia