Descubre y comparte nuestro conocimiento público

Se han encontrado 27 recursos

Resultados de búsqueda

The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...


Colfer, C.J.P.[Methodes complementaires pour l'evaluation du bien-etre-social]Methodes complementaires pour l'evaluation du bien-etre-social

The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...


Colfer, C.J.P.Brocklesby, M.A.Diaw, C.Etuge, P.Günter, M.Harwell, E.McDougall, C.Porro, N.M.Porro, R.Prabhu, R.Salim, A.Sardjono, M.A.Tchikangwa, B.Tiani, A.M.Wadley, R.L.Woelfel, J.Wollenberg, Eva K.[GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.]GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.

Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...


Colfer, C.J.P.Prabhu, R.Günter, M.McDougall, C.Porro, N.M.Porro, R.[Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável]Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável

The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...


Colfer, C.J.P.Brocklesby, M.A.Diaw, C.Etuge, P.Günter, M.Harwell, E.McDougall, C.Porro, N.M.Porro, R.Prabhu, R.Salim, A.Sardjono, M.A.Tchikangwa, B.Tiani, A.M.Wadley, R.L.Woelfel, J.Wollenberg, Eva K.[Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano]Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano

This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...


Salim, A.Colfer, C.J.P.McDougall, C.[Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano]Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano

This chapter reports the results of research in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, originally designed to assess quickly and easily the level and nature of participation by local people in forest management. The authors briefly describe pertinent results from their assessment methods. Although the funct...


Colfer, C.J.P.Wadley, R.L.[From "participation" to "rights and responsibilities" in forest management: workable methods and unworkable assumptions in West Kalimantan, Indonesia]From "participation" to "rights and responsibilities" in forest management: workable methods and unworkable assumptions in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

This chapter makes use of data from research conducted in 1996 in and around Danau Sentarum Wildlife Reserve in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Its initial purpose was to contribute to the development of principles, criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. The particular topic inves...


Colfer, C.J.P.Wadley, R.L.Harwell, E.Prabhu, R.[Assessing intergenerational access to resources: using criteria and indicators in West Kalimantan, Indonesia]Assessing intergenerational access to resources: using criteria and indicators in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Who Counts Most? Assessing Human Well-Being in Sustainable Forest Management presents a tool, ‘the Who Counts Matrix’, for differentiating ‘forest actors’, or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...


Colfer, C.J.P.Prabhu, R.Günter, M.McDougall, C.Porro, N.M.[Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management]Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management

The Basic Assessment Guide for Human Well-Being (or The BAG) focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest managem...


Colfer, C.J.P.[The BAG: basic assessment guide for human well-being]The BAG: basic assessment guide for human well-being

The Scoring and Analysis Guide for Assessing Human Well-Being is designed to supplement The BAG and The Grab Bag. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following t...


Salim, A.Colfer, C.J.P.McDougall, C.[Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being]Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being

Selecciona los documentos para visualizarlos

Nombre del archivo Ver recurso