Who Counts Most? Assessing Human Well-Being in Sustainable Forest Management presents a tool, ‘the Who Counts Matrix’, for differentiating ‘forest actors’, or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
[Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management]
,
Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management
The Basic Assessment Guide for Human Well-Being (or The BAG) focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest managem...
The Scoring and Analysis Guide for Assessing Human Well-Being is designed to supplement The BAG and The Grab Bag. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following t...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being]
,
Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being
The Grab Bag: Supplementary Methods for Assessing Human Well-being is designed to complement The BAG. The Grab Bag is designed for use by social scientists who may find The BAG overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a cou...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
[The Grab bag: supplementary methods for assessing human well-being]
,
The Grab bag: supplementary methods for assessing human well-being
This paper provides three types of evidence demonstrating women’s importance in forest management. The first draws on Colfer’s extensive, long term ethnographic experience in the forests of the United States and Indonesia---showing the various ways in which women participate in local, informal fo...
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Panduan penilaian dasar kesejahteraan manusia]
,
Panduan penilaian dasar kesejahteraan manusia
Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
[Siapa yang perlu dipertimbangkan? menilai kesejahteraan manusia dalam pengelolaan hutan lestari]
,
Siapa yang perlu dipertimbangkan? menilai kesejahteraan manusia dalam pengelolaan hutan lestari
This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Panduan cara pemberian skor dan analisis untuk menilai kesejahteraan manusia]
,
Panduan cara pemberian skor dan analisis untuk menilai kesejahteraan manusia