This chapter describes the history of criteria and indicators work at CIFOR, as an introduction to the subsequent chapters in this book. It also outlines the conceptual framework used to place human well-being within the topic of sustainable forest management. This includes a definition of human ...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Byron, Y.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Introduction: history and conceptual framework]
,
Introduction: history and conceptual framework
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG]
,
Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG
Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
[Qui compte le plus? Evaluer le bien etre social dans la gestion durable des forets]
,
Qui compte le plus? Evaluer le bien etre social dans la gestion durable des forets
This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Guide de notation et d'analyse pour l'evaluation du bien-etre cocial]
,
Guide de notation et d'analyse pour l'evaluation du bien-etre cocial
The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.]
,
GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.
Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
[Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável]
,
Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável
The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano]
,
Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano
This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano]
,
Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano
This chapter examines the hypothesis that sustainable forest management (as represented by currently good quality forest) is correlated with acknowledgement of the rights of concerned stakeholders to manage the forest. It used a pebble sorting method, designed to assess the allocation of rights t...
Tchingkawa B.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Porro, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
[Rights to manage the forest cooperatively and equitably in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts]
,
Rights to manage the forest cooperatively and equitably in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts