Autor:
Zeitoun, M.
Lankford, B.A.
Krueger, T.
Forsyth, T.
Carter, R.
Hoekstra, A.Y.
Taylor, R.
Varis, O.
Cleaver, F.
Boelens, R.
Swatuk, L.
Tickner, D.
Scott, Christopher A.
Mirumachi, N.
Matthews, Nathaniel
This article reviews and contrasts two approaches that water security researchers employ to advance understanding of the complexity of water-society policy challenges. A prevailing reductionist approach seeks to represent uncertainty through calculable risk, links national GDP tightly to hydro-cl...
Enlace original:
https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/78532
Zeitoun, M.
,
Lankford, B.A.
,
Krueger, T.
,
Forsyth, T.
,
Carter, R.
,
Hoekstra, A.Y.
,
Taylor, R.
,
Varis, O.
,
Cleaver, F.
,
Boelens, R.
,
Swatuk, L.
,
Tickner, D.
,
Scott, Christopher A.
,
Mirumachi, N.
,
Matthews, Nathaniel
,
[Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges]
,
Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges
