The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG]
,
Guide de base pour l'evaluation du bien-etre social the BAG
Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
[Qui compte le plus? Evaluer le bien etre social dans la gestion durable des forets]
,
Qui compte le plus? Evaluer le bien etre social dans la gestion durable des forets
This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Guide de notation et d'analyse pour l'evaluation du bien-etre cocial]
,
Guide de notation et d'analyse pour l'evaluation du bien-etre cocial
The BAG focuses on the social criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, a topic that has been the subject of considerable controversy and uncertainty. It is designed for people interested in assessing sustainable forest management, but who do not have a high degree of expertise i...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.]
,
GBA guia básico de avaliação do bem-estar humano.
Who counts most? Assessing human well being in sustainable forest management presents a tool, 'the Who Counts Matrix', for differentiating 'forest actors', or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
[Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável]
,
Quem é mais importante? A avaliação do bem-estar humano no manejo florestal sustentável
The Grab Bag' is designed to complement 'the BAG' and for use by social scientists who may find 'the BAG' overly prescriptive. The eight methods presented are either more difficult for non-social scientists to use or, in a couple of cases, can substitute for one or more method presented in 'the B...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Brocklesby, M.A.
,
Diaw, C.
,
Etuge, P.
,
Günter, M.
,
Harwell, E.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
Porro, R.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Salim, A.
,
Sardjono, M.A.
,
Tchikangwa, B.
,
Tiani, A.M.
,
Wadley, R.L.
,
Woelfel, J.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
[Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano]
,
Os acessórios: métodos suplementares para avaliar o bem-estar humano
This is designed to supplement 'the BAG' and 'the Grab Bag'. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following the section on scoring is a section on analysis. It be...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano]
,
Guia de pontuação e análise para avaliar o bem-estar humano
Gender and human diversity are critical aspects of sustainable forest management and human well-being. This chapter draws on experiences of a criteria and indicators (human well-being assessment) methods test in Kalimantan, Indonesia, to explore these concepts, and gender and diversity analysis i...
McDougall, C.
,
[Gender and diversity in assessing sustainable forest management and human well-being: reflections on assessment methods tests conducted in Bulungan, East Kalimantan, Indonesia]
,
Gender and diversity in assessing sustainable forest management and human well-being: reflections on assessment methods tests conducted in Bulungan, East Kalimantan, Indonesia
Who Counts Most? Assessing Human Well-Being in Sustainable Forest Management presents a tool, ‘the Who Counts Matrix’, for differentiating ‘forest actors’, or people whose well-being and forest management are intimately intertwined, from other stakeholders. The authors argue for focusing formal a...
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
Prabhu, R.
,
Günter, M.
,
McDougall, C.
,
Porro, N.M.
,
[Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management]
,
Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management
The Scoring and Analysis Guide for Assessing Human Well-Being is designed to supplement The BAG and The Grab Bag. It provides a scoring method that can be used with the two manuals, to come to a decision about particular criteria and indicators in particular forest and human settings. Following t...
Salim, A.
,
Colfer, C.J.P.
,
McDougall, C.
,
[Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being]
,
Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being