This learning brief is part of a series to capture the process, progress and lessons from CCAFS in its endeavor to plan, implement and deliver research outcomes. Since the last of these learning
notes was published1, the process for finalizing the impact pathways (IPs) was considerably simplified...
Schuetz, Tonya
,
Förch, Wiebke
,
Thornton, Philip K.
,
Wollenberg, L.
,
Hansen, James
,
Jarvis, Andy
,
Coffey, Kevin
,
Bonilla Findji, Osana
,
Loboguerrero Rodriguez, Ana María
,
Martínez Barón, Deissy
,
Aggarwal, Pramod K.
,
Sebastian, Leocadio S.
,
Zougmoré, Robert B.
,
Kinyangi, James
,
Vermeulen, Sonja J.
,
Radeny, Maren A.O.
,
Moussa, Abdoulaye S.
,
Sajise, A.
,
Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
,
Richards, Meryl
,
Jost, Christine
,
Jay, A.
,
[Learning Brief: Lessons in Theory of Change from a Series of Regional Planning Workshops]
,
Learning Brief: Lessons in Theory of Change from a Series of Regional Planning Workshops
This document outlines how the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) should work on monitoring and evaluation, outlining a strategy for the work. The Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy is structured into three main sections: Goals and Objectives; Theoreti...
Do CCAFS’ climate data and tools contribute to development outcomes?
The production of International PublicGoods (IPGs) – such as high quality, easy to use climate data and tools – is part of CGIAR CCAFS’ delivery promise. With CCAFS’ transition to a results-based management approach there is an ...
Rassmann, Kornelia
,
Schuetz, Tonya
,
Thornton, Philip K.
,
Cramer, Laura
,
[Exploring and developing effective evaluative approaches for evidencing the contribution of CCAFS climate data and tools towards development outcomes]
,
Exploring and developing effective evaluative approaches for evidencing the contribution of CCAFS climate data and tools towards development outcomes
This module looks at assessment, monitoring and evaluation frameworks that are necessary for the successful adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA). Focus is placed mainly at the subnational and national levels. However, some case studies address activities at the farm or project level. The m...
Kanamaru H
,
Hancock, J.
,
Bockel, Louis
,
Braimoh, A.K.
,
Förch, Wiebke
,
Grewer, Uwe
,
Hiepe C
,
Jonsson M
,
Krishnamurthy K
,
Marais S
,
Medeiros K
,
Matteoli F
,
Seeberg-Elverfeldt, C
,
Thornton, Philip K.
,
Touchemoulin O
,
Vantwout T
,
[Module 18: Assessment, monitoring and evaluation]
,
Module 18: Assessment, monitoring and evaluation
This is an updated version of the “CCAFS Theory of Change facilitation guide”. Revised Version: 15 December 2014. This improved, simplified facilitation guide documents the ways CCAFS is currently using an IP approach in its program planning.
Previous version can be found here: http://hdl.hand...
Schuetz, Tonya
,
Förch, Wiebke
,
Thornton, Philip K.
,
[Revised CCAFS Theory Of Change Facilitation Guide]
,
Revised CCAFS Theory Of Change Facilitation Guide
The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) is using theory of change (TOC) planning to specify research outputs, partnerships needed to produce outputs, and a plausible hypothesis on how these outputs will contribute to development outcomes. This learning ...
Schuetz, Tonya
,
Förch, Wiebke
,
Thornton, Philip K.
,
Wollenberg, Eva K.
,
Hansen, James
,
Jarvis, Andy
,
Coffey, Kevin
,
Bonilla Findji, Osana
,
Aggarwal, Pramod K.
,
Sebastian, Leocadio S.
,
Zougmoré, Robert B.
,
Kinyangi, James
,
Vermeulen, Sonja J.
,
Radeny, Maren A.O.
,
Moussa, Abdoulaye S.
,
Sajise, A.
,
Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
,
Richards, Meryl
,
Jost, Christine
,
Jay, A.
,
Loboguerrero Rodriguez, Ana María
,
Martínez Barón, Deissy
,
[Lessons in Theory of Change from a Series of Regional Planning Workshops]
,
Lessons in Theory of Change from a Series of Regional Planning Workshops
Thornton, Philip K.
,
Förch, Wiebke
,
Cramer, Laura
,
Vasileiou, Ioannis
,
Jost, Christine
,
Kristjanson, Patricia M.
,
[Lessons learned from the Flagship 4 Results-based management Trial]
,
Lessons learned from the Flagship 4 Results-based management Trial